Sunday, December 18, 2011

The Mouth-Body Connection: Garbage In=Garbage Out

Discover why good dental health depends on more than brushing and flossing, and why a clean, happy mouth gives your whole body something to smile about.

By Bonnie Blodgett
Let's face it. Most of us take our teeth for granted. Sure, we brush and floss (well, some of the time). And we know, of course, that teeth are essential for chewing our food and for maintaining a beautiful smile. But when we get a cavity – or even when we get diagnosed with gum disease that might culminate in root canals or tooth loss – we seldom think of these problems as posing permanent risks to our health and vitality.

We simply don't place the same importance on our dental health as we do on, say, the health of our vital organs. After all, the mouth is the domain of the dentist; the body, the domain of the doctor.

But that perspective is changing. Recent research provides convincing evidence that oral health and overall health are inextricably linked – that what's good for our mouth is also good for the rest of the body we work so hard to keep fit and healthy. Dentists increasingly screen for systemic diseases, which involve many organs or the whole body, through tongue assessments, saliva tests, blood pressure checks, and simple observation of the teeth and gums. As well they should: More than 90 percent of systemic diseases have oral symptoms such as lesions, according to the Academy of General Dentistry. Dentists are also checking for signs of inflammation that could affect heart health as we age. When they see trouble, they make referrals to physicians.

To emphasize the connection between oral health and overall health, Vincent J. Iacono, DMD and former president of the American Academy of Periodontology, offers the not-so-appealing metaphor of the mouth as a garbage dump on the edge of a river: "You wouldn't be surprised if the lake downstream ended up polluted with the garbage from the dump. A patient's bloodstream acts very much like the river in this analogy, in that it carries the bacteria from the periodontal plaques, possibly 'polluting' the arteries of the heart with periodontal bacteria, causing inflammation of the arteries, which may lead to a heart attack. This potential effect of periodontal bacteria further supports the need for periodic deep cleanings to enhance overall health and well-being."

This same effect has also convinced the American Heart Association (AHA) that dentists are very much on the front lines of healthcare. In addition to helping us keep our teeth firmly planted in our mouths as we age, oral-health experts are also destined to play a more important role in helping us maintain our vitality and overall quality of life.

A New Approach to Dental Health
This link between oral and overall health, now becoming common in conventional dentistry, has for years been a key tenet of what's known as holistic dentistry, which takes an integrated approach to dental care. Holistic dentists advocate for optimal nutrition. They take a minimally invasive approach to resolving dental problems. Some even evaluate a patient's skeletal structure and, of greatest controversy, often shun the use of fillings that contain mercury and call for replacing those amalgams.

Holistic dentists consider conventional dentists too quick to remove troublesome teeth, perform root canals, and insert "unnatural" substances and appliances into the mouth, arguing that these toxic substances create unhealthy imbalances in the mouth's natural ecosystem. But there are signs that the members of the Holistic Dental Association and the American Dental Association (ADA) may be inching closer together, at least philosophically.

Conventional dentists like P. Piero, DDS, of Holland, Mich., an ADA member in good standing, have some doubts about many of holistic dentistry's claims and methods. But Piero is pushing his colleagues further in the direction of what many in the profession are calling a "whole-person" approach to dentistry. Piero, who has spent two decades developing his own oral-care system (www.dentalairforce.com), represents a new breed of dental practitioner. He considers himself a teacher and passes along what he learns about oral health and hygiene to his patients. He isn't shy about discussing the difference between good and bad bacteria, their role in building plaque, and what happens when the bad guys get loose in the bloodstream. A visit to Piero may include a conversation about changes in diet and lifestyle – changes, he emphasizes, that could prevent not only tooth decay but also tooth loss. He knows that the longer his patients keep their teeth, the longer they're likely to live.

Healthy Mouth, Healthy Body
Good oral health calls for more than just brushing and flossing. It requires eating nutritious foods, exercising, avoiding cigarettes and alcohol, and controlling blood pressure. It may also mean looking to your dentist as a resource for more than cleanings and fillings. After all, troubles in the mouth not only predict disease, they can also exacerbate and even cause it.

John Laughlin III, DDS, of River Falls, Wis., has been practicing holistic dentistry for years. Many patients come to him when nothing else has eased their chronic pain or fatigue. Laughlin recalls one woman who came to him because she developed such severe flulike symptoms following a root canal that she "thought she was dying." She'd consulted several doctors who could find no cause for her symptoms.

Laughlin, suspecting an infection below the crown capping the root canal, referred her to an oral surgeon to have the tooth removed. The oral surgeon refused because, as Laughlin puts it, "he could see nothing wrong with the tooth." Six weeks and three doctors later, the woman finally signed papers absolving her surgeon of any responsibility for the outcome. He then removed the tooth – and found that the dead nerve remnant beneath it was not only infected but that the infection had spread to the bone, which was badly eroded.

More surgery was required to fill the large hole with bone taken from her inner cheek. The woman's symptoms immediately disappeared. She credits Laughlin with saving her life.

An equally convincing and more far-reaching example of the mouth-body health connection is evidenced by the well-established link between periodontal disease (infected gum tissue that can lead to tooth loss) and cardiovascular illness. Such disease is now considered as reliable a predictor of cardiovascular disease as smoking, diabetes, hypertension, high cholesterol and elevated serum triglycerides. A 2004 AHA study found that pericoronitis (infected wisdom teeth) heads the list of dental risk factors for heart disease. Others, in order of importance, are gingivitis, root remnants, cavities and missing teeth.

Periodontal disease has also long been associated with diabetes; now it's being linked to other chronic illnesses involving not just the heart but also the lungs and the brain, and to low-birth-weight babies and preeclampsia (a condition characterized by high blood pressure and the presence of protein in the urine). It is also known to be more prevalent in postmenopausal women, probably because of lower estrogen levels, which also cause bone loss and, not incidentally, heart disease.

How all these problems intersect remains somewhat mysterious. Consider tooth loss: Like other oral health problems, it involves a vicious cycle. An older person who has lost teeth and can't chew properly doesn't get all the nutrition available in food, which exacerbates the underlying problem that caused his or her teeth to have a precarious grip in the first place. In other words, the gum disease itself may have a nutritional basis (too many doughnuts and soft drinks, perhaps), which in turn caused systemic problems such as poor bone health or a chronic disease. Healthcare providers do know that tooth loss is a predictor of longevity (the longer we keep our teeth, the longer we live) and that losing teeth nearly doubles a person's heart-attack risk.

Inflammation and Cardiac Illness
Need more convincing about the mouth-body connection? Consider the death of a middle-aged man who'd had a defective heart valve replaced and seemed to be recovering well: He was told to take antibiotics before dental visits to prevent infection from bacteria that can escape from the mouth into the bloodstream during cleaning. Apparently the antibiotics weren't enough to prevent a massive infection, which led to a fatal heart attack.

The fact that inflammation – often a result of infection – causes strokes and heart attacks has been widely accepted and is now being studied in depth by the AHA. Nowadays, it's not unusual during a routine physical to be given a test for C-reactive protein, a marker for systemic inflammation, especially if you have other risk factors for heart disease. Bad teeth, poor oral hygiene and diet are usually implicated when inflammation is detected.

Saliva is our first line of defense against the "bad" bacteria that cause plaque to form on our teeth. Plaque buildup may cause gingivitis, which can lead to periodontitis and, if left unchecked, to something called acute necrotizing ulcerative gingivitis, or trench mouth. Bacteria from those conditions can enter the bloodstream after routine dental cleanings, or even after flossing and brushing at home. Bad bacteria can also make its way into the bloodstream when saliva flow is reduced because of antibiotics or medications, such as antidepressants, disrupting the normal bacterial balance of the mouth.

Bacteria that manage to slip into the bloodstream (called bacteremia) could cause an infection elsewhere, especially if a body's immune system has been weakened by a disease like AIDS or by cancer treatments. And if those bad bacteria find their way to the lining of diseased heart valves, the result can be infective endocarditis. That's the condition that took the life of that middle-aged man who thought he was on the road to cardiac health, but died after a routine dental cleaning.

The Case for Good Hygiene
In his practice, Piero addresses systemic problems with patients even as he is filling their cavities or helping them decide whether to straighten their crooked teeth. He considers anything unnatural in the mouth dangerous (whether a crown, an implant or a cosmetic veneer), but not because of the fear of mercury toxicity often cited by holistic dentists. Rather, he says, such things interfere with what he thinks is the most important issue in dentistry: the battle against bad bacteria.

"The mouth is a war zone," Piero says, referencing the more than 500 species of bacteria that inhabit it. "Bad bacteria are usually anaerobic – they live in the absence of air." Their excrement turns into plaque, which is actually a multilayered biofilm and very difficult to remove once it's got a foothold, and especially dangerous if its presence has created periodontal inflammations known as pockets. This process causes illness in other parts of the body not just by allowing bad bacteria into the bloodstream but also by causing the body to fight back with enzymes called cytokines that trigger a systemic inflammatory response. He believes this cycle is the primary link between oral and whole-body health.

"Hygiene is everything," says Piero, who recommends patients visit him four times a year for intensive cleanings, rather than the standard twice-yearly visits. "A 16-year-old kid can have perfect teeth, but his beautiful smile won't last long without good dental habits. It's like letting your new Ferrari sit out in the rain. I'm looking at the long term. Our kids are going to live to be 100. Their teeth have to last that long, too."

Piero points out that bacteria can be spread through any sort of contact. "Yes, periodontal disease is hereditary, but it is also an infectious disease. Kissing, eating – many activities bring new kinds of super-smart bacteria into the mouth. They are highly adaptive: They can change quickly to new conditions in order to survive."

Given the potential impact oral conditions can have on our total health, says Piero, it would be wise for us to show the same respect for our teeth that we would to other parts of the body. "The area of our exposed gum tissue equals that of our forearm, about 9 square inches," he points out. "What would we do if suddenly our forearm was inflamed? We'd run to the doctor. But periodontal disease is painless. Hidden." And so we ignore it.

Dentistry for Life
Jessica Saepoff, DDS, belongs to the ADA and five other major dental organizations. Like Piero, she has developed her own interpretation of holistic dentistry. Her practice, Natural Dental Health Associates, in Issaquah, Wash., specializes in alternative methods, which she considers not so much alternative as simply the most advanced. She routinely communicates with her patients' other holistic health practitioners so they can work together toward comprehensive health goals.

For Saepoff, dental care always comes down to personal choice. "I tend to attract patients who are opposed to taking even small theoretical risks, whether it's eating pesticides in their food or having mercury in their mouths," she says. "I understand that drilling is sometimes necessary, but the goal of my practice is to preserve natural tooth structure."

Whether you take the holistic path to oral health or the conventional approach, one thing is certain: The way you think about your teeth may change dramatically in coming years, as new studies shed more light on the myriad ways in which a healthy mouth is essential to overall health and vitality, and a key factor in longevity. With your doctor and your dentist by your side, you'll be able to keep your smile beautiful, and to keep flashing that great grin for years to come.

Bonnie Blodgett is a writer and editor in St. Paul, Minn. She publishes a quarterly for gardeners, The Garden Letter, and is working on a book about smell.

Wednesday, December 7, 2011

EWG Publishes List of 10 Worst Kids Cereals

Kids’ Cereals Pack More Sugar Than Twinkies and Cookies

More than three-quarters of the cereals assessed fail proposed federal nutrition standards

Washington, D.C. – Parents have good reason to worry about the sugar content of children’s breakfast cereals, according to an Environmental Working Group review of 84 popular brands.
Kellogg’s Honey Smacks, at nearly 56 percent sugar by weight, leads the list of the 10 worst children’s cereals, according to EWG’s analysis. In fact, a one-cup serving of the brand packs more sugar than a Hostess Twinkie, and one cup of any of the 44 other children’s cereals has more sugar than three Chips Ahoy! cookies.
In response to the exploding childhood obesity epidemic and aggressive food company advertising pitches to kids, Congress formed the federal Interagency Working Group on Food Marketed to Children to propose standards to Congress to curb marketing of kids’ foods with too much sugar, salt and fat.
But EWG has found that only one in four children’s cereals meets the government panel’s voluntary proposed guidelines, which recommend no more than 26 percent added sugar by weight. EWG has been calling for an even lower cap on the maximum amount of sugar in children’s cereals.
“When I went to medical school in the 1960s, the consensus view was sugar provided ‘empty calories’ devoid of vitamins, minerals or fiber,” said health expert Dr. Andrew Weil“Aside from that, it was not deemed harmful. But 50 years of nutrition research has confirmed that sugar is actually the single most health-destructive component of the standard American diet. The fact that a children's breakfast cereal is 56 percent sugar by weight – and many others are not far behind – should cause national outrage.”
“Cereal companies have spent fortunes on convincing parents that a kid’s breakfast means cereal, and that sugary cereals are fun, benign, and all kids will eat,” said noted NYU nutrition professor Marion Nestle“The cereals on the EWG highest-sugar list are among the most profitable for their makers, who back up their investment with advertising budgets of $20 million a year or more. No public health agency has anywhere near the education budget equivalent to that spent on a single cereal. Kids should not be eating sugar for breakfast. They should be eating real food.”
“As a mom of two, I was stunned to discover just how much sugar comes in a box of children’s cereal,” said Jane Houlihan, EWG’s Senior Vice President of Research. “The bottom line: most parents would never serve dessert for breakfast, but many children’s cereals have just as much sugar, or more.”
Studies suggest that children who eat breakfasts that are high in sugar have more problems at school. They become more frustrated and have a harder time working independently than kids who eat lower-sugar breakfasts. By lunchtime they have less energy, are hungrier, show attention deficits and make more mistakes on their work.
About one in five American children is obese, according to the federal Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, which has reported that childhood obesity has tripled over the past 30 years.
“It has been said that exploding rates of obesity and type 2 diabetes in today's children will lead them to be the first in American history to have shorter lifespans than their parents,” Weil said. “That tragedy strikes me as a real possibility unless parents make some dramatic changes in their children's lives.”
“Nearly 20 percent of our children and one-third of adults in this country are obese. Our children face a future of declining health, and may be the first generation to have a shorter lifespan than their parents. We must provide consumers with the information they need to make healthier choices and prevent misleading claims about the nutritional contents of food,” said Congresswoman Rosa DeLauro (D-CT). “Cereal is a prime example of this—we know that children do better in school if they have breakfast. But we also know that the type of breakfast matters. And yet, as the Environment Working Group’s report shows, many children’s cereals have sugar content levels that are above 40 percent by weight. Our children deserve better, and it is critical that we take action to combat America’s obesity epidemic.” Congresswoman DeLauro serves on the appropriations subcommittee responsible for the Food and Drug Administration and agriculture, where she oversees drug and food safety.
10 Worst Children’s Cereals
Based on percent sugar by weight
1.) Kellogg’s Honey Smacks55.6%
2.) Post Golden Crisp51.9%
3.) Kellogg’s Froot Loops Marshmallow48.3%
4.) Quaker Oats Cap’n Crunch’s OOPS! All Berries46.9%
5.) Quaker Oats Cap’n Crunch Original44.4%
6.) Quaker Oats Oh!s44.4%
7.) Kellogg’s Smorz43.3%
8.) Kellogg’s Apple Jacks42.9%
9.) Quaker Oats Cap’n Crunch’s Crunch Berries42.3%
10.) Kellogg’s Froot Loops Original41.4%

Some cereals are better than others. Nutrition expert Marion Nestle recommends:
  1. Cereals with a short ingredient list (added vitamins and minerals are okay).
  2. Cereals high in fiber.
  3. Cereals with little or no added sugars (added sugars are ingredients such as honey, molasses, fruit juice concentrate, brown sugar, corn sweetener, sucrose, lactose, glucose, high-fructose corn syrup and malt syrup).
Among the best simple-to-prepare breakfasts for children are fresh fruit and high-fiber, lower-sugar cereals. Better yet, pair fruit with homemade oatmeal.

Sunday, December 4, 2011

World Health Organization Update on Dental Amalgam

WHO Calls for 'Phase Down' of Dental Amalgam

 
October 24, 2011 — A World Health Organization (WHO) committee this month called for a worldwide reduction in the use of dental amalgam to cut the flow of mercury into the natural environment.
"In an environmental perspective, it is desirable that the use of dental amalgam is reduced," Poul Erik Petersen, DDS, DrOdontSci, responsible officer of the Global Oral Health Programme, told Medscape Medical News.
Dr. Petersen chaired a 2-day conference on amalgam as part of a United Nations effort to organize a worldwide treaty on mercury. The WHO released a report of the proceedings on October 11.
At a meeting in Geneva, Switzerland, from November 16 to 17, 2009, 29 experts from 15 countries concluded that the use of dental amalgam results in 180 to 240 metric tons of mercury being discharged into the atmosphere, soil, and water every year. In contrast, 80 to 100 metric tons are recycled, sequestered, or disposed of securely, the report said. However, the report concludes, amalgam should not be banned outright because alternative filling materials are more expensive and not as reliable.
The report calls for research to improve filling materials and said the use of all dental filling materials should be reduced through measures that prevent caries.
The report drew praise from an antimercury activist group, World Alliance for Mercury-Free Dentistry, which released a statement calling the report a "road map for the end of amalgam."
However, a spokesman for the American Dental Association said it is not necessary to reduce the use of dental amalgam at all. "There is no reason per se to phase down amalgam," Rodway Mackert, DMD, PhD, a professor of dentistry at Georgia Health Sciences University in Augusta, told Medscape Medical News. "The effect of doing that on the amount of mercury going into the environment is negligible."
Dental caries are becoming an increasing problem in middle- and low-income countries as they adopt Western lifestyles, including high consumption of sugars, but have not yet begun widespread preventive programs, such as fluoridation, the report says. As a result, the need for filling materials is expected to grow in these countries.
Already, dental amalgam is releasing "a significant amount" of mercury into the environment, the report found. This pollution results from amalgam made for dental use but diverted to other purposes, from poor disposal practices, and from cremation, the report said.
It laid out "best management practices," including bulk mercury collection, chair-side traps, amalgam separators, vacuum collection, recycling, and commercial waste disposal to prevent mercury from being released into the environment. It cited a US Environmental Protection Agency estimate that 3.7 tons of mercury are discharged into the environment from US dental practices each year.
Dr. Mackert said this is trivial compared with the 1500 tons generated by mining and other industrial uses in the United States, and he cited an US Environmental Protection Agency report saying that human activity only accounts for a third of the total mercury released into the environment. "Most of the mercury in tuna and things like that comes from natural sources like undersea volcanic vents," he said. "Reducing man-generated mercury is so much silliness."
He said the American Dental Association supports best management practices because if mercury gets into sewage sludge, then waste management companies cannot sell the sludge. However, amalgam has clear advantages over other restorative materials, so it should remain available to US dentists, Dr. Mackert said.
The WHO report considered the merits of amalgam vs other restorative materials. It cites a study finding that the repair rate for composite resin restorations was 7 times greater than for amalgams in posterior primary and permanent teeth.
On the hotly contested issue of toxic effects from amalgam, the report quoted a study by the Norwegian Dental Biomaterials Adverse Reaction Unit, finding that "the majority of side-effects of dental filling materials are linked with dental amalgam." Most of these are skin reactions and pain occurring within a week after treatment.
The report noted that amalgam surfaces release mercury vapor into the mouth and lungs, but stopped short of attributing any health effects to this phenomenon, and pointed out that other restorative materials may also cause adverse reactions.
So far, only Norway has completely banned amalgam, but some other Scandinavian countries have policies for reducing its use. The report noted that wealthy countries are better able to avoid amalgam because they have been able to institute caries prevention programs, and because patients can afford more expensive materials.
Less-wealthy countries and indigent people living inside wealthy countries should not be deprived of access to amalgam restorations until better alternatives emerge, the report concludes.
Dr. Mackert has served as an expert witness for dental supply companies sued for producing amalgam. Dr. Petersen has disclosed no relevant financial relationships.

Wednesday, November 23, 2011

Oral Bacteria & Pneumonia - Is There A Link?


Oral bacteria linked with pneumonia risk
By Rabia Mughal, Contributing Editor
November 18, 2011 -- Oral microbiota could play a role in identifying patients at risk for healthcare-associated pneumonia, according to a study presented October 22 at the Infectious Diseases Society of America annual meeting in Boston.

"The bodies of healthy individuals are cohabited by an incredible number of bacteria, where bacterial cells outnumber human cells 10 to 1," said study author Samit Joshi, DO, MPH, from the department of internal medicine at the Yale University School of Medicine, in an interview with DrBicuspid.com.

Scientists are now learning how different communities of bacteria reside in different parts of the body and how they can directly or indirectly influence states of health or disease, including pneumonia.
“Changes in oral bacteria play a role in the risk for developing pneumonia.”
— Samit Joshi, DO, MPH
Dr. Joshi and his colleagues wanted to determine if an association existed between the oral microbial profile and subsequent development of pneumonia.
They used advanced DNA sequencing to show that the types of bacterial communities that normally reside in adults' mouths change substantially as their risk for developing pneumonia increases.

While presenting his study at the meeting, Dr. Joshi reported that there was a distinct divergence between the oral bacteria of mechanically ventilated intensive care unit (ICU) patients who developed pneumonia and those who did not.
"In the case of hospitalized adults on mechanical ventilators, the change in bacteria preceded the development of pneumonia," Dr. Joshi said. "This suggests that changes in oral bacteria play a role in the risk for developing pneumonia."

Streptococcaceae dominant

Healthcare-associated pneumonia is a growing public health problem, but strategies to identify high-risk patients remain problematic, according to Joshi and his colleagues. While impaired oral hygiene is a known modifiable risk factor, the precise alterations in oral microbiota are unknown, they added.

The researchers looked at 37 subjects who were prospectively followed for a one-month period. The subjects included healthy community-dwelling adults (19, average age 60) and those at risk for healthcare-associated pneumonia: nursing home residents (10, average age 86) and mechanically ventilated ICU patients (8, average age 51).

The authors used a technique called 16S rRNA gene pyrosequencing to compare the oral microbial profiles of the study participants.

They found that the dominant bacteria in the mouth were Streptococcaceae but that the proportion differed across the three clinical settings, with community dwellers averaging 65%, nursing home residents at 43%, and the mechanically ventilated ICU patients at 33% (p = 0.02 for ventilator patients versus community dwellers).

While the ICU subjects who subsequently developed pneumonia had a significantly smaller average proportion of oral Streptococcaceae (7%) at baseline compared with the ICU subjects who did not develop pneumonia (49%, p = 0.02), the proportions of three other groups -- the Enterococcaceae, the > Micrococcaceae, and the Mycoplasmataceae -- rose sharply in this group.

Also, the bacterial community composition among ICU subjects who developed pneumonia was significantly different from the ICU subjects who did not develop pneumonia.

"Oral microbial profiles differ in community-dwelling adults compared to those in healthcare settings at high risk for pneumonia," the authors concluded. "Mechanically ventilated ICU subjects who subsequently developed pneumonia had a distinct divergence of their oral microbial profiles compared to ICU subjects who did not develop pneumonia."
Pyrosequencing of oral microbiota could be helpful in identifying patients at high risk of healthcare-associated pneumonia, they added.

However, it will still be a number of years filled with additional intensive research before these preliminary findings can be used to improve prevention and clinical care for patients at high risk of developing pneumonia, he added.  "By discovering how microbial communities change prior to the development of pneumonia, physicians and scientists could develop new techniques to identify patients at risk for pneumonia and discover new ways to prevent pneumonia in the future," Dr. Joshi concluded.

Saturday, November 19, 2011

Fluoridated water - The Debate Continues


Budget challenges prompt some to rethink fluoridation
By Rob Gozkowski, Dr. Bicuspid.com


November 16, 2011 -- The issue of water fluoridation has flared up again in communities across the U.S. In October, an article in the New York Times contended that budget constraints and skepticism over fluoride's effectiveness were responsible for some 200 communities abandoning the practice. And MSNBC reported that tea party activists had hijacked a fluoridation debate in Pinellas County, FL, resulting in the end of fluoridated water for 700,000 people there.


More news from the fluoride front poured in on November 15, when the Santa Clara Valley Water District in California voted unanimously to fluoridate water to segments of San Jose, which will give access to more than 280,000 residents. The move was applauded by the Pew Children's Dental Campaign, which had teamed with two other organizations, Voices for America's Children and the American Academy of Pediatrics, to sound the alarm about "misinformation" being spread by antifluoridation activists through its new Campaign for Dental Health, also launched on November 15.

South of San Jose, the city of Watsonville's efforts to fluoridate its water have been conflicted for nearly a decade. In 2002, residents voted by a small margin to eliminate fluoridation. But a subsequent court battle, which Watsonville lost, led to a city council vote last year to accept $1.6 million in funding from the California Dental Association (CDA) to build a fluoridation system. Per state law, a California city with a population greater than 10,000 must fluoridate its water if outside funding is provided.

“The voters didn't feel fluoridation was necessary.”
— Steve Palmisano, city water division
     manager, Watsonville, CA
"The decision on whether or not to fluoridate was purely political, based on the efforts of the city council," Steve Palmisano, the city's water division manager told DrBicuspid.com. "Although it was 10 years ago, I think the primary objection was to putting additional substances in the water with potentially harmful side effects. The voters didn't feel it was necessary."

They may ultimately get their wish. Watsonville's fluoridation project stalled last month when all five construction bids arrived between $1.2 and $1.9 million above the CDA's grant. The CDA is unlikely to get help from the city as it ponders its next move. Palmisano asserted that Watsonville won't build the fluoridation devices unless they are paid for with outside funding, and that the city is unable to chip in anyway.

"The decision really is in the hands of the CDA," he said. "I had a conversation with them, asked for an indication if it will go through, and they didn't give me any at all."

3 treatment plants, $10 million


Despite the November 15 vote endorsing fluoridation for the Santa Clara Valley Water District, Donald Gage, director of District 1 and 2011 chair, shared a similar view. 

"We have three things in our charter: One, provide clean, safe drinking water. Two, flood control. And three, environmental issues," Gage told DrBicuspid.com. "[Fluoridation] is not something we're supposed to do, and we don't have the money anyway."


Because it is a wholesaler, the Santa Clara Valley Water District is not beholden to the state's fluoridation law. But the district intends to move forward with water fluoridation anyway -- if the cost issues can be adequately addressed.

The equipment the Santa Clara Valley Water District needs to provide fluoridation at its three treatment plants will cost $10 million, Gage said. The district's looming priorities, per its charter, start with what Gage estimates to be $500 million needed to seismically retrofit aging area dams. Replacing antiquated levies around the region's delta may cost even more.
"What we're doing is setting up a general policy that will enable the people who want water fluoridation to move forward with it," Gage said. "There's some wording in there that needs to be changed because it doesn't allow public/private partnership." The details, he explained, will be addressed later.

Now the Health Trust, a Silicon Valley nonprofit promoting wellness, and the California Department of Public Health are working to identify potential funding sources for the equipment installation. Gage believes that the communities that will receive fluoridated water, such as San Jose and Sunnyvale, should foot the bill for operations and maintenance once the infrastructure is in place, at a cost of about $1 per person annually. That is where his opinion about fluoridation ends.
"If the majority wants it, because we're a democratic society, I'm willing to do it," he said. "But other than that, because I'm not scientist, I have to look to the federal and state government to tell me whether it's safe or not."

Science and Budget Concerns

For one Florida county commissioner, contradictions between federal agencies regarding fluoridation led to his determination that it should be ended. Norm Roche, who has an extensive background in Pinellas County Water Department policy research, became a national lightening rod for his stance on fluoridation when he led a successful effort to cease fluoridating the water supply for roughly 700,000 Floridians this year. But he believes his position has been mischaracterized.
Roche told DrBicuspid.com that he has expressed concerns about fluoridation since 2003, when the council first voted in favor of it.

"My issue back then, as it is today, is with the actual chemical we use to fluoridate the water, fluorosilicic acid," he explained. "On the one hand, the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention talks of fluoridation as a great concept. But the U.S. Food and Drug Administration will not approve fluorosilicic acid for human consumption. So there are competing federal agencies there on the issue."

He is also concerned by a lack of consensus among physicians, dentists, and chemists about which particular type of chemical should be used and whether ingesting fluoridated water was better than a topical delivery via dentifrice.
"Expecting seven politicians to watch experts, doctors, accuse each other of faulty information and then look at us saying, 'You make the call ...' -- I don't find that to be our role," he explained.

There were other complications with fluoridation as well. Pinellas switched to a regional water source about 10 years ago, and now receives a blended mix of desalinized water, ground water, and surface water from a local river.
"All of them have various degrees of naturally occurring fluoride, which made our plant operators almost daily have to tweak the fluorosilicic acid drip," he explained. "It became a complex issue -- and guesswork."

While the cost of fluoridation was not a major consideration, Roche acknowledged that it played a role in the issue. "It was born, if you will, of the budget discussion," he said. "But the fiscal impact was the least of my concerns."

A Philosophic Disagreement

Scott Tomar, DDS, DrPH, a professor at the department of community dentistry and behavioral science at the University of Florida College of Dentistry, is worried that other communities will take a similar tack while governments look to trim budgets.
“It came down more to a philosophic disagreement than a financial one.”
— Scott Tomar, DDS, DrPH, University
     of Florida College of Dentistry
"I think it certainly has emboldened opponents to fluoridation to seize on it," he told DrBicuspid.com. "What I'm seeing more of lately, and I think what happened in Pinellas County, it came down more to a philosophic disagreement than a financial one."

That is the sort of impression that has dogged the Pinellas County city commission's decision. After the narrow 4-3 vote, national attention ensued -- due primarily to the Associated Press describing the decision as a tea party victory for smaller government, according to Roche.

"I interviewed with the NY Times, "NBC Nightly News," Rachel Maddow, "The Daily Show" even, all based on the misinterpretation of the decision," he recalled. "And they all went, 'This isn't really the story we got on the AP wire.' "
The perception of tea party politicians blocking fluoridation has been aided by the way other districts have handled fluoridation. Dr. Tomar referenced a recent example in High Springs, FL, where fluoridation landed on the city council's agenda.

"In my testimony before the city council, I raised the point that of $8,000 that they might save, all they're really going to do is transfer it onto the backs of their citizens," he recalled. "But they said, it was never about the money, it was more a discussion of whether city or county government should be providing preventive services."

Dr. Tomar cited other examples in which opposition to fluoridation centered on whether it is an essential service. While most are swayed by the notion that the savings end up coming out of the pockets of the community needing greater dental work, he said the role of government is an argument that's been coming up a lot.
"The science is on our side, fully supported by every legitimate health and medical organization," he said. "But if there's a political opposition to it that has nothing to do with the science, there isn't much you can do to change that."
While Roche has asserted that he's unconcerned with the political aspect of the issue, he sees inefficiency in the fluoridation process.

"If you want to reach 10,000 underprivileged people who aren't getting adequate access to dental care, do you publicly fluoridate the water for 1 million just to get to them?" he asked. "Or do you focus your resources in order to get them the help that they need?"

Trust also appears to be a factor.

"One of the other issues arising here is, even though cities and counties have been fluoridating for quite a long time, Florida still gets an 'F' for dental care for the indigent and underprivileged," Roche said, also noting that only 25% of dentists in the state will see Medicaid patients. "Is their position to keep fluoride in the water so that they won't have to see them? I think that's a valid part of the discussion."

Sunday, November 13, 2011

Gum Disease Can Increase the Time It Takes to Become Pregnant


Science Daily -- Professor Roger Hart told the annual meeting of the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology that the negative effect of gum disease on conception was of the same order of magnitude as the effect of obesity.

Prof Hart, who is Professor of Reproductive Medicine at the University of Western Australia (Perth, Australia) and Medical Director of Fertility Specialists of Western Australia, stated, "Until now, there have been no published studies that investigate whether gum disease can affect a woman's chance of conceiving, so this is the first report to suggest that gum disease might be one of several factors that could be modified to improve the chances of a pregnancy."  Researchers found that women with gum disease took an average of just over seven months to become pregnant -- two months longer than the average of five months that it took women without gum disease to conceive.

Periodontal (gum) disease is a chronic, infectious and inflammatory disease of the gums and supporting tissues. It is caused by the normal bacteria that exist in everyone's mouths, which, if unchecked, can create inflammation around the tooth; the gum starts to pull away from the tooth, creating spaces (periodontal pockets) that become infected. The inflammation sets off a cascade of tissue-destructive events that can pass into the circulation. As a result, periodontal disease has been associated with heart disease, type 2 diabetes, respiratory and kidney disease, and problems in pregnancy such as miscarriage and premature birth. Around 10% of the population is believed to have severe periodontal disease. Regular brushing and flossing of teeth is the best way of preventing it.


The researchers followed a group 3737 pregnant women, who were taking part in a Western Australian study called the SMILE study, and they analysed information on pregnancy planning and pregnancy outcomes for 3416 of them.  In addition, non-Caucasian women with gum disease were more likely to take over a year to become pregnant compared to those without gum disease: their increased risk of later conception was 13.9% compared to 6.2% for women without gum disease. Caucasian women with gum disease also tended to take longer to conceive than those who were disease-free but the difference was not statistically significant (8.6% of Caucasian women with gum disease took over one year to conceive and 6.2% of women with gum disease).  "Our data suggest that the presence of periodontal disease is a modifiable risk factor, which can increase a woman's time to conception, particularly for non-Caucasians. It exerts a negative influence on fertility that is of the same order of magnitude as obesity. This study also confirms other, known negative influences upon time to conception for a woman; these include being over 35 years of age, being overweight or obese, and being a smoker. There was no correlation between the time it took to become pregnant and the socio-economic status of the woman." professor Hart said.  Information on time to conception was available for 1,956 women, and of, these, 146 women took longer than 12 months to conceive -- an indicator of impaired fertility. They were more likely to be older, non-Caucasian, to smoked and to have a body mass index over 25 kg/m2. Out of the 3416 women, 1014 (26%) had periodontal disease.

Prof Hart said that the reason why pregnancies in non-Caucasian women were more affected by gum disease could be because these women appeared to have a higher level of inflammatory response to the condition."  All women about to plan for a family should be encouraged to see their general practitioner to ensure that they are as healthy as possible before trying to conceive and so that they can be given appropriate lifestyle advice with respect to weight loss, diet and assistance with stopping smoking and drinking, plus the commencement of folic acid supplements. Additionally, it now appears that all women should also be encouraged to see their dentist to have any gum disease treated before trying to conceive. It is easily treated, usually involving no more than four dental visits." he added.

The SMILE study was one of the three largest randomised controlled trials performed in Western Australia. It showed conclusively that although treatment of periodontal disease does not prevent pre-term birth in any ethnic group, the treatment itself does not have any harmful effect on the mother or fetus during pregnancy.

Obesity Link to Periodontal Disease

In a study titled "MicroRNA Modulation in Obesity and Periodontitis," lead author Romina Perri, University of North Carolina School of Dentistry, Oral Health Institute, conducted a pilot investigation to determine whether obesity or periodontal disease modified microRNA expression and whether there was any potential interaction between obesity and periodontitis that could involve microRNA modulation. This study is published in the Journal of Dental Research, the official publication of the International and American Associations for Dental Research (IADR/AADR). 

In this investigation, total RNA was extracted from gingival biopsy samples collected from 20 patients in 4 groups:

  • 5 non-obese [BMI < 30kg/m2] participants with a healthy periodontium
  • 5 non-obese participants with periodontitis
  • 5 obese [BMI > 30kg/m2] participants with a healthy periodontium
  • 5 obese participants with periodontitis).


Two microRNA species (miR-18a,miR-30e) were up-regulated among obese individuals with a healthy periodontium. Two microRNA species (miR-30e,miR-106b) were up-regulated in non-obese subjects with periodontal disease and in the presence of periodontal disease and obesity, nine microRNAs were significantly up-regulated (miR-15a,miR-18a,miR-22,miR-30d,miR-30e,miR-103,miR-106b, miR-130a,miR-142-3p,miR-185 and miR-210).

The authors conclude that the data are consistent with the concept that miRNA that are induced by chronic nutritional stress leading to obesity may also non-parsimoniously modulate inflammatory pathways within periodontal tissues and affect disease expression. "The expression of specific microRNA species in obesity provides new insight into possible mechanisms of how risk factors might modify periodontal inflammation and may represent novel therapeutic targets," said JDR Editor-in-Chief William Giannobile. A perspective article titled "Obesity, Inflammation and Oral Infections: are microRNAs the Missing Link?" was co-authored by Francesco D'Aiuto and Jean Suvan, University College London Eastman Dental Institute. In it, the authors suggest that these data could represent a mechanistic breakthrough in our understanding of the modulatory effects of obesity on periodontal tissue destruction, but caution reproducibility of these findings is needed in larger and well-characterized cohorts.